General Ledger Accounting Services
Keep ledger records current, accounts reconciled and month-end reporting ready for review.
ARDEM manages recurring general ledger work, including supported postings, reconciliations and journal preparation. The accounts, periods and review requirements define the scope. We organize delivery around the records your finance team needs to review and close the books.
ARDEM owns delivery of the agreed ledger workflow. Each open item has an explanation, an action owner and a review checkpoint. Our team pursues missing support and coordinates corrections so your finance leaders can review completed work rather than chase its status.
General ledger work in practice: In a manufacturing finance operation, ARDEM supported recurring reconciliations, journals and period-end activities within a relationship that continued and expanded for more than four years. Review the documented manufacturing workflow and controls.
For a connected operation across payables, receivables and accounting, explore finance and accounting outsourcing. A general-ledger engagement can also begin with a defined set of accounts or period-end activities.


General ledger maintenance connects transactions to supporting records, reconciliations and reporting. ARDEM organizes recurring work around your chart of accounts, entity rules, review requirements and close calendar.
Your finance team receives supported postings, reconciled account records, journal and accrual support, period-end schedules and explanations of recurring differences. The agreed scope defines the review criteria and delivery checkpoints.
Our General Ledger Accounting Services cover a wide range of functions. These are crucial for maintaining the integrity and accuracy of your financial records:

Post in-scope transactions with source references, entity and account coding, validation and the required review status.
Compare ledger balances with supporting records, document differences and track each unresolved item through correction or review.
Prepare agreed balance-sheet, profit-and-loss and supporting schedules from reviewed records for the designated finance owner’s approval.
Prepare and post authorized journals, with supporting calculations, period references and documented approval for adjustments and accruals.
Organize requested reconciliations, workpapers and supporting documents for review. An independent audit or assurance opinion is a separate engagement.
Maintain agreed accounting records and schedules for your tax advisers. Tax advice, filing and sign-off are not assumed within general-ledger processing.
Prepare historical schedules and agreed comparisons to support finance-led budgeting. Planning assumptions and decisions follow the defined ownership model.
Document validation, review and escalation steps, with access and posting responsibilities defined for the accounts and systems in scope.
Investigate agreed account movements and budget-to-actual differences, distinguish timing from errors, and support explanations with source records.
Prepare reconciled cash records and agreed schedules for finance review. Posting and reporting do not by themselves guarantee liquidity.
Configure agreed mappings, intake rules, system handoffs and acceptance checks in the approved environment, with representative testing before production.
Check that debits and credits balance across the affected accounts, while reviewing coding and support. A balanced entry still requires validation.
The scope defines the records, review criteria and accepted outputs for your operation. ARDEM follows exceptions through resolution and reports delivery against the agreed accounting calendar.
Start with the accounts, recurring differences and close checkpoints that need attention. Share your general ledger requirements with ARDEM.

The following example can be configured to the accounts, systems and review requirements in your engagement.
This is an illustrative package, not an actual client artifact or a universal service commitment.


Start with the accounts, periods and review deadlines. Identify the source records and the approvals needed for adjustments. ARDEM can document an effective process or build the missing steps, then test the workflow before production.
Work can take place in your approved accounting system or connect through APIs, scheduled exchanges or secure files. Implementation covers field mapping, access, rejected postings and confirmation that the destination accepted the information. Real-time delivery is used only where system capabilities and required review support it.
Test representative transactions, journals and reconciliation differences before expanding production. An unexplained difference stays open with an owner and next action; it is not treated as resolved simply because a file was delivered.
During recurring delivery, track completion against the close calendar, aged unresolved items, rejected output and rework. When a result falls short, ARDEM owns investigation and corrective action within the agreed scope.
If the same difference appears each month, compare the underlying records and posting history before proposing a correction. A timing issue, missing reference or mapping error may require a different action. Validate the cause, obtain the required approval, implement the change and check whether the difference recurs. This describes an operating approach, not a reported client result.
For an industrial manufacturer, ARDEM connected daily finance work with monthly balancing, cashbook and work-in-progress reconciliation, journal entries and closed-period accruals inside the client’s existing systems. Bi-weekly governance addressed exceptions and workflow changes.
The published case documents a relationship that continued and expanded for more than four years, with less disruption from repeated finance-team retraining. It demonstrates continuity across an integrated AP, AR and close-support operation, not a guaranteed close-time reduction or an independent audit opinion.
Read the manufacturing finance workflow and documented results.


The team is selected around the accounting work, systems and review requirements. ARDEM manages the operating roles and handoffs so your finance leaders do not have to supervise each transaction.
Specific professional credentials or specialist sign-off requirements are confirmed for the proposed scope and personnel, not inferred from a general role label.
Cost reflects the accounts and entities included, transaction volume and the effort required to reconcile the records. Systems and review deadlines also affect the scope. Compare setup and historical cleanup separately from recurring delivery. Include review, management and retained internal effort, not just processing fees.
Yes. The workflow can run in approved client systems or use tested connections for the required information. We define access, mappings, review rules, failed-transfer handling and accepted output before production. Adopting an ARDEM platform is not a prerequisite.
We can assess available source records, the periods affected and unresolved balances, then propose a bounded cleanup workflow. Historical corrections need supporting evidence and the designated approvals. We do not assume missing records can be reconstructed without adequate documentation.
Map daily postings, reconciliations, journals and reporting schedules to the agreed review dates. Identify source-data and approval dependencies, then test a defined scope before expanding. Track completed outputs, aged open items and rework rather than promising the same close deadline for every business.
No. The managed scope can organize records, workpapers and reconciliations for review. An independent audit opinion, tax advice or other specialist sign-off is not implied by general ledger processing and must be addressed separately.

ARDEM aligns the team’s accounting and system experience with the work in scope. We document execution, review and escalation responsibilities and train the team on the relevant account and entity rules. Any required professional credentials are confirmed for the proposed personnel and activities before production.
Agree the accounts, entities, source records and review checkpoints before production. The operating model connects routine work and exception resolution to the accounting result your finance team needs.
AI-assisted capture can prepare information from supporting documents. Configured checks can validate references, compare records and route exceptions. Accounting specialists review uncertain information and the support for proposed adjustments. Posting authority remains defined by the engagement.
See how AI, automation and specialist judgment work together.
Evaluate the proposed processing, review, management and exception work alongside implementation, systems and retained internal effort. The agreed scope and baseline determine whether the operating model meets your cost and delivery objectives.
The operating model identifies the delivery lead, accounting reviewers, escalation route and reporting cadence. ARDEM coordinates the agreed work and corrective action rather than leaving each unresolved task with the client to chase.
The manufacturing example on this page documents recurring reconciliations, journals and close support within a long-running finance operation. Compare that workflow with your accounts, systems and review requirements.









Agree the approved systems, permitted users, access responsibilities and data-handling requirements before production. The operating scope should identify how accounting records are accessed, transferred and retained.
Review current assurance documentation for the specific entity and system proposed for your operation. Infrastructure-provider assurance, application assurance and organization-wide assurance need separate scope checks; one does not automatically establish the others.
Document posting permissions, approval responsibilities, review evidence and escalation paths around your accounting policies. Any support for client control or SOX requirements is defined in the engagement and reviewed against those requirements.
Tell us which ledger accounts or entities need attention. Include your systems, close deadlines and recurring differences. A senior ARDEM accounting consultant will respond by email to discuss the required outputs and operating scope.
"*" indicates required fields